The postponement of the US M1A1 Abrams tanks’ delivery to the Ukrainian military could lead to more complications than initially anticipated. The US has decided to push back the delivery of these tanks to Ukraine due to extended training requirements.

While this might seem inconsequential at first glance, it poses a significant challenge that hasn’t been highlighted. The delay translates into the delivery falling into Ukraine’s autumn season, characterized by heavy rainfall. The resulting muddy conditions, a product of Ukraine’s fertile black soil, have previously caused a shift in the Ukrainian spring offensive to summer.

This time of year is particularly challenging for combat vehicles as their mobility is severely restricted. This puts Ukraine at a disadvantage as its forces are on the offensive, requiring movement, while Russian forces are in defensive positions.

From a political perspective, Russia has already managed to destroy the first English-supplied tank to Ukraine, the Challenger 2. This event marked the first time in history that an English Challenger 2 tank was destroyed by the Russian army.

This incident has undoubtedly tarnished the reputation of British military equipment. Until now, Challenger 2 was renowned for its resilience. Russian sources even claim that a second Challenger 2 was destroyed by the Kornet anti-tank missile system.

The destruction of Western-supplied equipment in Ukraine is symbolic. It demonstrates that no weapon is invincible and that both Russian and Ukrainian forces can suffer losses, regardless of public perception or patriotic sentiment. All armor, be it Russian, British, or American, is vulnerable.

Speculation suggests that the destruction of the Challenger 2 tank is why the US decided to extend the training period for Ukrainian tank crews. The US aims to avoid sending Abrams tanks to Ukraine and facing similar embarrassment from Russian media. However, the impending muddy conditions in Ukraine could also serve as a reason for further delaying the delivery of American tanks. But what makes these muddy conditions a concern for the M1 Abrams?

The Abrams M1 tanks are engineered to function in diverse weather conditions, including rain and muddy terrains. Although the heavy rains and Ukrainian mud might pose certain challenges, they are not expected to entirely halt the tanks’ movement.

These tanks are fitted with robust engines and sophisticated suspension systems that enable them to navigate through challenging terrains. Nevertheless, the performance of these tanks might be somewhat impacted.

Mud can decrease traction and hinder the tanks’ ability to maneuver swiftly and efficiently. This could also escalate the risk of jamming or silting, necessitating extra time and effort to restore the tanks. Hence, while the tanks can still operate under such conditions, their combat performance might be slightly compromised.

To counteract the effects of rain and mud, Abrams M1 tanks are equipped with features that enhance their mobility. The tanks have broad tracks that distribute their weight over a larger surface area, reducing the chances of sinking into soft ground.

Moreover, the tanks have high ground clearance, enabling them to traverse muddy terrains without getting stuck. The tanks also possess a self-cleaning system for their tracks that helps prevent mud accumulation and maintain traction.

These design elements allow the tanks to keep moving even under challenging weather conditions, although their speed and agility might be marginally reduced. However, it is this agility and reduced speed that could pose a problem for the Ukrainian Abrams crews. When these stats are underrated, tanks become easy targets.

The influence of rain and mud on the combat performance of the Abrams M1 tanks extends beyond just mobility. Tanks depend on advanced guidance systems and sensors for accurate target engagement and battlefield assessment.

Heavy rain and muddy conditions can interfere with these systems’ operation. Rain can affect optics and sensors, diminishing visibility and potentially impacting target acquisition. Mud splatter on the tank’s exterior can also obstruct visibility and make it harder for the crew to identify and engage enemy threats.

Therefore, while tanks can still operate under such conditions, their ability to effectively attack targets and maintain situational awareness might be compromised.

Support in adverse weather conditions Moreover, the upkeep and logistics of the Abrams M1 tanks can become more demanding in rainy and muddy environments. Mud can accumulate on the tanks’ exterior and components, necessitating more frequent cleaning and maintenance.

Tanks might also need additional resources and equipment for recovery operations if they get stranded or immobilized. These factors can escalate the logistical burden and potentially restrict the combat readiness of the tanks.

Therefore, it’s crucial for military forces to take into account environmental conditions and strategize accordingly to ensure effective deployment and maintenance of tanks in such environments.

The Kornet Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) explained The Kornet Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) is a weapon system developed by Russia, intended to destroy armored vehicles. It’s a wire-guided missile that can be launched from various platforms, including ground-based launchers, vehicles, and helicopters.

The missile is fitted with a tandem-charge warhead, comprising two explosive charges. The first charge is designed to penetrate the vehicle’s armor, while the second charge is meant to detonate inside the vehicle, inflicting maximum damage. The Kornet ATGM has been in production since the late 1990s and continues to be used by various countries globally.

The Kornet ATGM operates using a semi-automatic command-to-line-of-sight (SACLOS) guidance system. This implies that the operator must keep the missile’s crosshairs on the target until impact.

The missile is launched from a tube, and once airborne, the operator uses a joystick to guide the missile towards the target. The missile’s guidance system receives commands from the operator via a wire that connects the launcher to the missile. This wire enables the operator to adjust the missile’s flight path, ensuring accurate targeting.

The Kornet ATGM’s history The Kornet ATGM was first manufactured in the late 1990s by the Russian company KBP Instrument Design Bureau. It was developed as an upgrade to the earlier AT-5 Spandrel missile. Since its introduction, the Kornet has gained popularity and has been exported to numerous countries, including Algeria, Iran, Syria, and Saudi Arabia. It has also been used in various conflicts, such as the Syrian Civil War and the Yemeni Civil War.

The Kornet ATGM carries a tandem-charge warhead, which consists of two explosive charges. The first charge is a precursor charge that neutralizes the vehicle’s reactive armor if present. The second charge is the main warhead, designed to penetrate the vehicle’s armor and cause significant damage.

The missile’s warhead is capable of penetrating up to 1,200 millimeters of rolled homogeneous armor (RHA), making it effective against a wide range of armored vehicles, including main battle tanks.

The Kornet Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) has proven its efficacy in various conflicts, demonstrating its potency against armored vehicles. There have been reports of it successfully neutralizing tanks and other armored targets, including those outfitted with reactive armor.

The missile’s high penetration capability and precision make it a formidable adversary against armored threats. Its demonstrated success in combat scenarios has led to its broad adoption by various military forces and insurgent groups.